Is Poststack a good Kontentino alternative for Indian agencies?
Yes, when your priority is INR billing, GST invoicing, UPI payments and a workflow built around multi-client content feedback. Kontentino may be the better fit when teams that need structured approvals and an analytics add-on is your primary requirement.
How does Poststack pricing compare with Kontentino?
Poststack uses flat INR plans by account band: ₹2,000 for 3 accounts, ₹4,400 for 10 accounts, or ₹8,000 for 30 accounts, with explicit add-ons for extra accounts and team members. Kontentino uses tier by users and social profiles, with analytics as a separate module. Its current public pricing snapshot is starter €69/month for 3 users and 10 profiles; standard 10 users €149/month for 40 profiles; analytics +€60/month, with the restrictions listed in the comparison above.
What is the biggest difference between Poststack and Kontentino?
Poststack supports two client workflows: a no-login magic link for quick post review and an authenticated client portal for ongoing workspace access. It also caps revision rounds and is billed in INR, while Kontentino structured approval workflow for team and client review.
Does Poststack support the same social networks as Kontentino?
Poststack publishes to Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X, YouTube and Threads. Compare that list with the networks your team actively manages, since broader coverage only matters when you use those channels.
What are Poststack's two client feedback workflows?
Use a magic link when a client needs to review a specific post without creating an account. Use the authenticated client portal when a client needs an ongoing view of their workspace calendar and feedback history. Both workflows feed into the same revision record for the operator.
Can clients review content without creating an account?
Yes. The magic-link workflow lets a client view a specific post and leave feedback without creating a Poststack account. Clients who need ongoing workspace access can use the authenticated client portal instead.